FLICHY IMAGINAIRE PDF
In The Internet Imaginaire, Patrice Flichy takes a thorough and comprehensive look at the sociological history surrounding the creation of the. The Internet imaginaire, Flichy argues, led software designers, businesses, politicians, and individuals to adopt this one technology instead of another. Flichy . |[kH The Internet Imaginaire. By Patrice Flichy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, The Internet Imaginaire is a translation from “L’imaginaire d’Internet” by.
|Published (Last):||28 February 2018|
|PDF File Size:||13.80 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.14 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
As our culture moves toward a knowledge economy, such prognostications may well be accurate, but I would view a knowledge-elite as far preferable to landed aristocracy and primogeniture. She’d taken a class with Ricoeur at The University of Chicago, but she found the introduction just as difficult as I had. I’ve always felt that name recognition must be far preferable to the sort of fame found in Us Magazine.
Straight to you every other week. Internet and Digital Economics: They say that the hallmark of science is that two scientists observing the same phenomenon should ultimately come to the same conclusion, and that is clearly not true for semiotics, where the main input is the Id of the observer.
Book Review: The Internet Imaginaire, by Patrice Flichy – Core77
While I hesitate to agree that semiotics is actually profound, it is certainly profoundly French, so my placement was well timed, although my subsequent confusion would have been equally difficult to deal with in far less lush landscapes.
By Xanthe Matychak – Jul 10, Summer read for designers For those you who need design all of the time–even in your fiction–meet Ethan Hoevel, a talented New York designer and the protagonist in The Tourists, a juicy first-novel by Jeff Hobbs. As such, I find Flichy’s use of semiotics as a framework somewhat confusing, when a capitalist or jmaginaire analysis would have suited it so much better.
Semiotics is most assuredly not about guessing deeper meaning or authorial intention.
The Internet imaginaire, Flichy argues, led software designers, businesses, politicians, and individuals to adopt this one technology instead of another.
Perhaps I’m wrong, but for my part, I’m quite certain that I don’t fully understand semiotics, and I suspect that given its vagaries, similar claims could be made of virtually any of its proponents. While I must admit that I did come to understand Ricoeur’s framework somewhat better after reading the book, I was even more amazed to discover that Flichy had succeeded notably in one aspect: References to this book Internet imagonaire Digital Economics: In this case, I felt that Flichy did imply deeper meaning into the actions and choices of the players than he possibly could have known.
Well, I received a number of replies to this review both via email and in post, which I suppose shows that the very nature of the word “semiotics” remains contentious. For those unfamiliar, it is a discipline concerned with exploring the deeper meaning of signs and symbols, and is a staple of communications studies.
I fully agree with Greg B, and probably Donald Norman as well, that design is not about emotion at least not the designer’sbut instead is about accommodating the behavior of its constituency not the designer and provoking immaginaire action. Indeed, in their fruition, the Internet and projects like it resist and confound semiotic analysis because they are the product of many hands.
Book Review: The Internet Imaginaire, by Patrice Flichy
It’s about everything; it’s about nothing. In his introduction Flichy relies flivhy on the work of Paul Ricoeur, one of the originators of the semiotics. Design Jobs Firms Awards Conference e. After reading the introduction, I must admit that I was completely furious, and more than a little confused by the terminology, but intrepid reviewer that I am, I soldiered on, intent to try to figure out just what this man vlichy trying to say. The Internet Imaginaire had what I would describe as hands-down the most difficult and convoluted introduction I’ve ever encountered.
The collective vision that shaped the emergence of the Internet: For those you who need design all of the time–even in your fiction–meet Ethan Hoevel, a talented New York designer and the protagonist in The Tourists, a juicy first-novel by Jeff Hobbs. Any other characterization has inherent flaws.
Recently a great deal of attention has been paid to what makes some societies successful and others less so. The metaphorical “information superhighway” became a technical utopia that informed a technological program. He analyzes the founding myths of cyberculture–the representations of technical systems expressing the dreams and experiments of designers and promoters that developed around imaaginaire highways, the Internet, Bulletin Board systems, and virtual reality.
Already have an account? Please enter your email and we will send an email to reset your password. Connecting futurists like Alvin Toffler, Cyberpunk authors such as William Gibson, and even open-source innovators like Linus Torvalds he describes the interaction between the Internet, politics and economics, going so far as to cite Canadian Marxist Arthur Kroker’s announcement of the arrival of a “virtual class,” where computer access and knowledge of “netiquette” would provide the foundations for a digital imaginwire that would benefit from its connection to the worldwide knowledge base, leaving the unplugged disenfranchised.
I’ve read film theory and aesthetics and simply find the stuff tedious and intellectually wanting. In choosing a tool that can be bent to imply purpose to any endeavor in retrospect, Flichy has wrapped the history of the Internet around an odd framework, but it’s certainly no stranger than what we’ve made the Internet into.
Instead of finding hidden meaning, they project their own demons. Keep me signed in Cancel. The Internet Imaginaire attempts to explain the emergence of the Internet through the framework of semiotics.
Here Flichy actually does begin to pull his initial if confounding argument together.